Autor: sg (alkor-si_at_NOSPAM.wp.pl)
Data: Wed 16 Jul 2003 - 08:10:50 MET DST
Użytkownik "Krzysztof Gibas" <killgore_at_poczta.wp.pl.spam> napisał w
wiadomości news:bf24ht.o0.1_at_kg.opole.pl...
> [...] Fitness
> znajduje się w połowie skali. [...]
<cytat ostatniego akapitu rozdziału 'About SMART values'
z helpa Speedfana>
Linearity in approaching the threshold level is unclear.
I assume that, but it's my way of interpreting those info
(I had to interpret it some way, didn't I? :-)). According
to all the reports I've received, there are, for example,
SEAGATE hard disks that report a very poor RAW READ ERROR
RATE attribute, leading to a low WORST value and, according
to the flags set for this attribute by the manufacturer, to
a low FITNESS index. I can tell you little more. This happens
even for brand new hard disks from this manufacturer. If you
happen to discover more, feel free to let me know :-)
</cytat ostatniego akapitu rozdziału 'About SMART values'
z helpa Speedfana>
Czyli po ludzku: nic strasznego, każdy Seagate tak ma :)
--
Pozdrawiam, "It doesn't think. It doesn't feel.
Sławek It doesn't laugh or cry.
All it does from dusk till dawn
Is make the soldiers die" -Onean children's rhyme
To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed 19 May 2004 - 10:44:06 MET DST