Re: Samsung 757DFX kontra LG 795FT

Autor: -=GOMEZ=- (p.kotowski_at_starpol.sse.pl)
Data: Thu 15 Nov 2001 - 13:22:16 MET

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_00CD_01C16DD8.8BD15580
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jedyna wada monitora 700IFT jest to, ze:
nie ma on wad
n i jeszcze, ze 1600x1200 nie p=F3jdzie w 85Hz
pzdr

------=_NextPart_000_00CD_01C16DD8.8BD15580
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Jedyn&#261; wad&#261; monitora 700IFT =
jest to,=20
&#380;e:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>nie ma on wad</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>n i jeszcze, &#380;e 1600x1200 nie =
p=F3jdzie w=20
85Hz</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>pzdr</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_00CD_01C16DD8.8BD15580--

To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue 18 May 2004 - 23:20:12 MET DST