Re: Samsung 757DFX kontra LG 795FT

Autor: KM (bolokm_at_box43.gnet.pl)
Data: Thu 15 Nov 2001 - 12:34:22 MET

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0097_01C16DD1.DAAC9360
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

  "Artur" <biczysko_at_lucent.com> wrote in message =
news:3BF39E7E.91786A40_at_lucent.com...
  Co byscie wybrali=20
  LG 795FT czy tez Samsunga 757DFX ???????=20

  Zdecydowanie LG 795FT

  pozdr

  KM

------=_NextPart_000_0097_01C16DD1.DAAC9360
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV>"Artur" &lt;<A=20
  href=3D"mailto:biczysko_at_lucent.com">biczysko_at_lucent.com</A>&gt; wrote =
in message=20
  <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:3BF39E7E.91786A40_at_lucent.com">news:3BF39E7E.91786A40_at_lucent.=
com</A>...</DIV>Co=20
  byscie wybrali <BR><B>LG 795FT</B> czy tez <B>Samsunga 757DFX =
</B>??????? <BR>
  <P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Zdecydowanie LG 795FT</FONT>
  <P><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>pozdr</FONT>
  <P><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>KM</FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0097_01C16DD1.DAAC9360--

To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue 18 May 2004 - 23:20:09 MET DST