Autor: dzieciol (pstry_at_puszcza.netom)
Data: Tue 01 Jun 1999 - 04:49:36 MET DST
Jacek Fiok wrote:
> "Now that number one is out of the way, here's number two: No matter what
> you read, see, hear, etc, the 100MHz FSB speed isn't any faster in any game
> benchmark, business application or any other Win95/98 app than the 66MHz
> FSB it replaces (when the core speeds of the two CPUs being compared are
> identical).
> This is surprising to many, but let us reassure you that we've performed
> over 2,000 PC benchmarks on both the 66MHz and the 100MHz FSB with all of
> the Pentium II lineup, and there's no benefit that we've ever seen, save
> for one of the Large Texture Transfer Tests in Winbench 3D 98. As games are
> written to take advantage of larger textures, which will require AGP to
> perform large texture swaps to a user's main system DRAM, then the
> importance of higher FSB speeds will become apparent. For the rest of 1998,
> and until the summer of 1999, there certainly won't be an instance where
> this becomes a problematic issue. "
>
> #1 (http://www.sharkyextreme.com/hardware/celeron_oc/m.shtml)
> #2 (dzieciol, jestesmy z toba ;)
>
> pozdrowionka,
>
> --
> Jacek Fiok
> j.fiok_at_zodiac.mimuw.edu.pl http://www.jfiok.capital.pl
>
> "All true wisdom is found on T-shirts."
Dziekuje, wlasnie o ten tekst mi chodzilo ale bookmarkow dotyczacych Celerona
mam tyle, ze naprawde aby podeprzec sie "strona" w sprawie tego o czym sie
wspomnialo trzeba wiele godzin kopac.
Przy okazji moze masz pod reka nowsze dane, pokazujace ktory z Celeronow da sie
podkrecic na dana szybkosc: prawie zawsze, czasami, wyjatkowo. Bylo cos w tym
stylu.
To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue 18 May 2004 - 18:35:16 MET DST