Re: Celeron 333- shajze?

Autor: dzieciol (pstry_at_puszcza.net)
Data: Sun 21 Feb 1999 - 19:36:33 MET


"MR.WooBooDoo" wrote:

> Czy to mozliwe zeby 333 nie poszledl na 416?
> Dostalem w lapy Costa Rica SL2WN i owszem odpali, ale pod windoza na
> wszystkim co sie nazywa 3D zaras sie wiesza. Jak to, zla seria czy jak?
> __
> wbd

"MR.WooBooDoo" wrote:

> Czy to mozliwe zeby 333 nie poszledl na 416?
> Dostalem w lapy Costa Rica SL2WN i owszem odpali, ale pod windoza na
> wszystkim co sie nazywa 3D zaras sie wiesza. Jak to, zla seria czy jak?
> __
> wbd

Nic pocieszajacego znaleziono na:
http://home.tampabay.rr.com/jbogush/celeronFAQ.htm#So you want to overclock
a

Which type of Celeron should I buy?

The key, of course, is getting the right stepping of the right type of
Celeron. First of all, the "wrong" Celerons
are the C300 (without the 'A' designation) and the C333. If you plan to
overclock your Celeron, stay away
from these two altogether. Because of multiplier locking [see "What is
'multiplier locking' and 'bus
locking'?"], the C333 severely limits your options. Reports of successful
overclocking are very rare with
these CPU's. While it's true that some Celerons have successfully run at
speeds up to 500 mHz, these
instances are rare [estimated at 5-10%]. If your C333 won't operate at 500
mHz (100 X 5), your only option
(since the multiplier is locked), is lowering the bus speed to 83 mHz (415
mHz) or 75 mHz (375 mHz).
Seventy-five and 83 mHz require the PCI and AGP devices to operate at
higher than normal speeds since
motherboards only provide the correct clock step-down dividers for the 66
mHz and 100 mHz clock speeds.
[Some motherboards may correctly divide the 133 mHz bus speed, but then
SDRAM timing becomes a
major problem.] Many devices do not react well to this condition.
Obviously, you are more likely to have
problems at 83 mHz than at 75 mHz. .........



To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue 18 May 2004 - 18:14:42 MET DST