Autor: Adam Nowak (vindex_at_friko.onet.pl)
Data: Tue 24 Mar 1998 - 20:33:49 MET
Jan Olszewski wrote:
>
> Adam Nowak napisał(a) w wiadomości: <3515A04D.51A505A8_at_friko.onet.pl>...
> >Cos nieuwaznie czytasz anandtech :
> >
> >"As mentioned before, not all CPU's will work at the 90MHz bus speed
> >setting, the Pentium MMX had no
> > problems at all clocking in at 180/90, 225/90, and
> >270/90. The AMD K6 and Cyrix 6x86MX test systems kept on
> > corrupting the Windows Registry file, however with
> >extreme and unorthodox cooling methods Winstone 97 did
> > complete a single test run, revealing the
> >performance of the 90MHz bus speed on Socket-7 processors is quite
> > dramatic itself...whetting our appetites for an
> >impressive introduction of the first true 100MHz bus speed Socket-7
> > motherboards later this quarter."
> >
> To teraz ja pobawie sie w cytowanie :
> "Why did I chose to use the AMD K6 in the tests instead of the Pentium MMX
> or Cyrix 6x86MX? Well, first of all, the Cyrix 6x86MX wouldn't even boot at
> the 100MHz bus speed setting. At 100 x 2.0 the system returned a dead
> screen (no video) and obviously at all higher speeds the system couldn't
> manage to do more than make a few noises. The Intel Pentium MMX went a bit
> further than that, the processor would boot at 100 x 2.0 as well as 100 x
> 2.5 (100 x 3.0 wouldn't boot at all, which is funny since 83.3 x 3.5 works
> perfectly fine) however Windows 95 failed to load with a Pentium MMX
> installed using the 100MHz bus speed."
>
> No i co?
> Moze Intel chodzi(system sie "butuje") jako tako na 100 Mhz pod dosem , ale
> W95 juz nie zdzierzy(Ciekawe jakby wlaczyli jakas gierke z Intelem ...
> trzask, prask...?)
>
> Pozdrowienia
>
> Jachoo
Bardzo mi przykro ale moje informacje sa nowsze :) Przejrzyj dokladnie
anandtech - twoj cytat jest jakies 2 tygodnie starszy :)
Pozdrowienia
Vindex
..
..
..
To archiwum zostało wygenerowane przez hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue 18 May 2004 - 17:06:58 MET DST